Monday, 7 December 2015

How does Williams create a sense of tension and drama for the audience in this extract (scene 4 – Blanche’s monologue)? You should analyse language closely and the way it is crafted to create effects. (30 marks).

The tension and drama is built up throughout scene 4 until the climax of Blanche’s monologue. However, the audience is already tense when the scene starts because scene 4 smoothly runs on from scene 3 where there was a lot of turbulence and violence between the characters. There is a plethora of emotions from the characters during the violent moments between Stanley and Stella, which leave the audience with tension into the following scene.
From the start of the scene there is “confusion” with the cries in the street like a “choral chant,” which signifies that this scene will be as equally as dramatic as the last.

Williams creates tension and drama before, during and after Blanche’s monologue. Before she starts to speak, there is dramatic irony as the audience knows that Stanley will “overhear[s] their following conversation”, however both Stella and Blanche assume they are alone. This means that Blanche would not hold back, as she presumes that Stanley would never hear what she has to say about him. This can only lead to an even more negative relationship between Stanley and Blanche, resulting in a never-ending conflict and hatred. This is very dramatic and tense because the audience knows that Stanley will lose control and perhaps get as violent as he did beforehand with Stella. Also, there is the loud sound of a train passing by – a perpetual metaphor used by Williams to imply that something bad is about to happen. We hear it when Stanley is outside, “unseen to the women,” which furthers the audience’s knowledge that something immoral will happen. The audience is already aware of the metaphorical noises or motifs – as the ‘blue piano’ and ‘varsouviana polka’ play when emotions or tensions are about to change/have changed.
The language used in Blanche’s monologue shows the audience her true feelings for Stanley with her use of similes, hedging and exclamatory sentences. Williams creates a dramatic atmosphere throughout her monologue because we (the audience) know that this is effectively the last straw for Blanche according to Stanley in their relationship. She compares Stanley to an animal, where she insists he “eats,” “moves,” and “talks” like one. Stanley does have animalistic behaviours that blanche mentions; where he ”bear[s] the raw meat home” then throws it at his wife, Stella. She takes it even further where she states that he is a “survivor of the stone age,” and is “sub-human.” This creates a dramatic air because these comparative insults are very demeaning and offensive. Blanche also repeats what she says in the form of hedging to build up the tension, leaving Stella and the audience eager to hear what she says next. Examples of this are: “And you – you here - waiting for him!” and “Stella – my sister there has been…”                                                                                                                                                                       Williams has Blanche use exclamatory sentences which in turn makes the monologue very dramatic; with the examples of “…kiss you!” “God!” and “Don’t – don’t hand back with the brutes!” The exclamation marks and italics get the idea across to the reader that Blanche is angry and isn’t holding back.
The train passes again after she has finished her monologue which indicates that what Blanche has just said will end in consequences, because we already know that the train is a negative metaphor. Stanley “hesitates” and licks his lips, suggesting that he is waiting to decide how to confront the women. Licking of his lips could infer that he is hungry – perhaps hungry for the kill of his sister-in-law, as Blanche suggests in her monologue by saying “Bearing the raw meat home from the kill in the jungle!” After, Stanley seems calm, and repeatedly “grins” at Blanche – this gives me the idea that he is still processing what she has said and is acting like he didn’t hear her, which gives him time to plot revenge or put time into what he has to say. It then seems tense between Stella and Blanche, as Stella clearly disagrees with Stella by showing her affection for Stanley by “fiercely” hugging him in “full view of Blanche.” This gives the idea that what Blanche has said has somewhat offended Stella, and her opinion does not change her love for him. This is dramatic because now two sisters have been pulled apart, leaving the audience awaiting the stage of the play where Stella and Stanley will be fighting with Blanche.
Overall, Blanche’s monologue is tense due to the language used by her, as we know that it will provoke a negative response from Stanley, who is listening in the conversation unbeknown to the women.  With the audience knowing but the women not, there is dramatic irony which makes the scene very tense to us. Also, the actions of the characters, such as Stella acting ”[coldly]” leads us to the idea that Blanche stands on her own when it comes to her opinion meaning that in the coming scenes she will fighting her own corner with no help from Stella (and obviously Stanley.)

No comments:

Post a Comment